Effective Communication Analysis
Under development.
Student Learning Outcomes
- Measured each Fall during Even Years:
- Collaboration
- Decision Making
- Measured each Fall during Odd Years:
- Effective Communication
- Ethics
Results
Resources
Current Results
Results show % meeting expectations on each outcome item. | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Written Communication | Oral Communication | |||||||||||||
notes | Location | Sample Size | Target Population (All students in program) | Sample % | % Meeting Expectations on Overall Rubric. (Aggregate Rubric Score) | Effective organization contributes to full development of written presentation | Conveys an accurate sense of audience with appropriate use of disciplinary language | Advances argument with sound evidence and appropriately cited references. Points are logically developed and flow logically from one idea to the next | Readability enhanced by effective language use, range of diction and syntactic variety | Moves beyond surface understanding; Demonstrates facility with topical and disciplinary knowledge | Presentations are clear, logical and organized. Listener can follow line of reasoning. | Student demonstrates full knowledge (more than required) by answering all class questions with explanations and elaboration. | Speaker used effective and appropriate technology (e.g. power points, graphs, etc.) | Nonverbal communication (professional manner, eye contact, etc.) added purpose to the presentation. |
MBA | All locations | 41 | 244 | 17% | 95% | 95% | 98% | 98% | 98% | 95% | 94% | 97% | 94% | 97% |
Stephenville | 9 | 42 | 21% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
Fort Worth | 12 | 75 | 16% | 93% | 93% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 92% | 100% | 92% | 100% | |
Midlothian | 2 | 13 | 15% | 100% | No Data | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
Online | 14 | 86 | 16% | 92% | 92% | 92% | 92% | 92% | 92% | 91% | 91% | 91% | 91% | |
Waco | 4 | 28 | 14% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Ethics Analysis
Under development
Current Results
notes | location | Sample Size | Target Population (All students in program) | Sample % | % Meeting Expectations on Overall Rubric. (Aggregate Rubric Score) | Student demonstrates knowledge of discipline’s code of ethics. | Student is able to recognize an ethic dilemma faced by organizations. | Student is able to identify relevant stakeholders affected by an ethical dilemma faced by organizations. | Student is able to identify appropriate ethical frameworks to address alternatives used for decision making. | Student is able to identify key decisions to be made regarding ethical dilemma faced by organizations. | Student is able to prioritize relevant stakeholder needs affected by an ethical dilemma faced by organizations. | Student is able to prioritize key decisions to be made regarding ethical dilemma faced by organizations. | Student is able to articulate a plan for addressing ethical dilemma. | Plan demonstrates an understanding of the motives and consequences of the action. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MBA | All locations | 50 | 244 | 20% | 98% | 97% | 98% | 98% | 96% | 98% | 96% | 98% | 94% | 94% |
Note: The university reports online students according to their location. Students showing in Stephenville, Midlothian, FTW or Waco are mostly online students.. | Stephenville | 9 | 42 | 21% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Fort Worth | 16 | 75 | 21% | 93% | 91% | 93% | 93% | 93% | 93% | 93% | 93% | 93% | 93% | |
Midlothian | 2 | 13 | 15% | 100% | No Data | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
Online | 15 | 86 | 17% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | |
Waco | 8 | 28 | 29% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 88% | 100% | 75% | 88% |