Effective Communication Analysis
Under development.
Student Learning Outcomes
- Measured each Fall during Even Years:
- Collaboration
- Decision Making
- Discipline Specific Knowledge (DSK)
- Comprehensive Exam
- Post-Graduation Uniform CPA Exam Pass Rates
- Measured each Fall during Odd Years:
- Effective Communication
- Ethics
- Discipline Specific Knowledge (DSK)
- Comprehensive Exam
- Post-Graduation Uniform CPA Exam Pass Rates
Results
Resources
Current Results
| Results show % meeting expectations on each outcome item. | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Written Communication | Oral Communication | |||||||||||||
| Location | Sample Size | Target Population (All students in program) | Sample % | % Meeting Expectations on Overall Rubric. (Aggregate Rubric Score) | Effective organization contributes to full development of written presentation | Conveys an accurate sense of audience with appropriate use of disciplinary language | Advances argument with sound evidence and appropriately cited references. Points are logically developed and flow logically from one idea to the next | Readability enhanced by effective language use, range of diction and syntactic variety | Moves beyond surface understanding; Demonstrates facility with topical and disciplinary knowledge | Presentations are clear, logical and organized. Listener can follow line of reasoning. | Student demonstrates full knowledge (more than required) by answering all class questions with explanations and elaboration. | Speaker used effective and appropriate technology (e.g. power points, graphs, etc.) | Nonverbal communication (professional manner, eye contact, etc.) added purpose to the presentation. | |
| MACC | All locations | 20 | 82 | 24% | 95% | 100% | 95% | 90% | 100% | 90% | 100% | 94% | 100% | 100% |
| Stephenville | 4 | 25 | 16% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| Fort Worth | 11 | 26 | 42% | No Data | No Data | No Data | No Data | No Data | No Data | No Data | No Data | No Data | No Data | |
| Waco | 5 | 31 | 16% | 100% | 100% | 80% | 100% | 60% | 100% | 75% | 100% | 100% |
Ethics Analysis
Under development
Current Results
| location | Sample Size | Target Population (All students in program) | Sample % | % Meeting Expectations on Overall Rubric. (Aggregate Rubric Score) | Student demonstrates knowledge of discipline’s code of ethics. | Student is able to recognize an ethic dilemma faced by organizations. | Student is able to identify relevant stakeholders affected by an ethical dilemma faced by organizations. | Student is able to identify appropriate ethical frameworks to address alternatives used for decision making. | Student is able to identify key decisions to be made regarding ethical dilemma faced by organizations. | Student is able to prioritize relevant stakeholder needs affected by an ethical dilemma faced by organizations. | Student is able to prioritize key decisions to be made regarding ethical dilemma faced by organizations. | Student is able to articulate a plan for addressing ethical dilemma. | Plan demonstrates an understanding of the motives and consequences of the action. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MACC | All locations | 3 | 82 | 4% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Stephenville | 1 | 25 | 4% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| Fort Worth | 0 | 26 | 0% | No Data | No Data | No Data | No Data | No Data | No Data | No Data | No Data | No Data | No Data | |
| Waco | 2 | 31 | 6% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |