Political Science 5303 Office: HUM 365
Dr. Barry Price Tel. Office 254-968-9630
Office Hours: MWF 2:00-4:30 Home 817-249-8397
E-Mail: price@tarleton.edu
Requires Adobe Acrobat ® Reader
Discussion Topics
Assigned Readings
![]()
![]()
COURSE
OVERVIEW:
This course introduces students to the fundamental
issues in Public Management/Public Administration. We begin by clarifying key differences between public the private
sector institutions. We then review the issues surrounding the selection of public employees in this country. After
discussing how these selection criteria have been altered by such current practices as Affirmative Action and disability
legislation, we investigate some of the key issues surrounding the management of public employees. Here we consider
alternate theories of management, as well as some practical tools managers may employ to accomplish their objectives.
Having surveyed public Management from the personnel perspective, we turn next to what is one of the most interesting
responsibilities of public managers; measuring public sector performance.
REQUIRED BOOKS:
Gaebler and Osborne. Reinventing Government.
Mosher. Democracy in the Public Service
In addition to this required book, students will be required to purchase a packet
of selected readings from journal articles, newspapers, and assorted other sources.
Overview of Public Employment
A Delicate Balance. Light. Chapter 1.
The Nature of Organizations
The Bureaucratic Experience. Hummel,
Chapter 1. Occupational Substructures in the Workplace.
Trice, Chapter 1.
Private vs. Public Bureaucracies
Managing People in Public Agencies. Brock
pp. 7-12.
Scenarios in Public Management
Lerner & Wanat. pp.1-9.
Search for Government Efficiency.
Downs and Larkey. Ch. 1 & 2.
Selecting Public Employees
Democracy and the Public Service. Mosher. Ch. 1, 3, 5.
Selected Civil Service, Affirmative Action, and ADA Materials.
Employee Motivation
The Human Side of Enterprise. McGregor.
Pp. 193-200.
The Art of Japanese Management. Pascale &
Athos. Ch 2 & 3.
Managing People in Public Agencies. Brock. Ch. 8.
Transforming Government
Reinventing Government.
Osborne and Gaebler. Ch. 1 - 3.
Managing as Mission
Reinventing Government.
Osborne and Gaebler. Ch. 4.
Managing as Customer Satisfaction
"Managing Government". Mintzberg pp. 75 - 83.
Reinventing Government.
Osborne and Gaebler. Chapter 6.
Participatory Management
Reinventing Government.
Osborne and Gaebler.
Ch. 9 & 10.
"Studies in Transformation: A Study in TQM".
Rago.
"Beware! TQM is Coming to Your..". Parker
& Slaughter.
"Reaching and Changing Frontline Employees". Larkin & Larkin
Barriers to Participatory Management
Managing for Excellence.
Bradford and Cohen.
Pp. 1 - 83.
"Why Supervisors Resist Employee Involvement".
Klein.
"Barriers to Organizational Democracy".
Smith.
An Alternate View (Recommended)
Managing with Power.
Pfeffer. All.
Measuring Performance
Reinventing Government. Osborne and Gaebler.
Ch. 5.
"Teacher Training Programs Given Notice: It's Heads Up Time for Meeting
Standards"
Course Mechanics:
Public Management will be taught as a distance learning course. Students will be
given a course syllabus with a set of discussion topics and corresponding assigned readings. Each week students
will complete the assigned readings and respond in writing to a corresponding set of study questions that will
be posted on the course Internet site. Student responses to these questions will vary in length according to the
nature of the questions, and the depth with which the student feels able to respond. Upon completing written responses
to the study questions, students will in turn post their responses to the course Internet site. A "due date"
will be noted on every set of study questions.
After reviewing the posted responses of fellow students to the study questions, seminar participants are expected
to provide a written reply to two or more responses. These replies may take issue with any interpretation of the
original reading assignment, challenge the views or opinions of the student writer, or comment on an additional
insight or understanding of the source material generated by the student commentary. As a seminar participant,
the instructor will also reply to student responses to the study questions, and be open to critique on any of his
own commentary.
As was the case with the original answers to the assigned study questions, replies by students to the work of other
seminar participants will be posted on the course Internet site. These replies must be posted within three days
after the due date listed on the assigned study questions.
In addition to the on-line seminar described above, students in the course will be expected to conduct an in-depth
taped interview with a public manager. In creating their interview questions, students are expected to draw heavily
on assigned course readings and subsequent class discussion. The instructor must approve a student's choice of
interview subject before the interview is set up.
Except under special circumstances, Tarleton faculty, as well as managers in an agency
where the student currently works, are inappropriate interview subjects.
All work posted either by the instructor, or seminar participants will be posted
on a course Web Board,
that can be reached from the instructors web page found at www.tarleton.edu/~Price
For seminar participants not familiar with use of the Web
Board protocol, the instructor will hold a workshop on campus the first week of the semester.
Attendance at the workshop, of course, is completely voluntary.
Although we will conduct much of this course on-line. The instructor encourages seminar participants to set up
faculty-student conferences where additional discussion/study of the course material can be accomplished. These
can be arranged either by calling (254-968-9630), or emailing (Price@tarleton.edu).
Course Grading Policies:
The student's semester grade in this seminar will be determined largely (75%) by the
quality of his or her weekly written work. This includes his/her answers to the study questions as well as his/her
commentaries on the work done by fellow seminar participants. The remainder of the student's grade (25%) will be
determined by the quality of his/her course interview.
![]()